Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5391 - 5400 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21

Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error is merely technical, we look to see whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13865 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
/Injunction actions. 11/21/2019 Form English Form English Summary English CV-503 Motion for De Novo Review
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=6&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=All&beg_date=&end_date=&page=2

[PDF] WI APP 230
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26961 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph A. Yanske
principles to those facts is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21053 - 2005-04-25

State v. David R. Olofson
to de novo review. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2012-10-25

State v. David E. Sanders
facts to allow the giving of an instruction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Head, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5770 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis. 2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29108 - 2007-05-16

Ronnie Prophet v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Inc.
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15296 - 2005-03-31

Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2013-09-18