Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5391 - 5400 of 69630 for had.
Search results 5391 - 5400 of 69630 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The second case had eight counts; the sentences were set concurrent to each other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
of extended supervision. The second case had eight counts; the sentences were set concurrent to each other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
802 LLC v. Don Kemp
called the bank and discovered that Kemp had apparently purloined the money order from her address book
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5502 - 2005-03-31
called the bank and discovered that Kemp had apparently purloined the money order from her address book
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5502 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a court trial, and that the defendant had enough time to discuss the decision with his attorney. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
of a court trial, and that the defendant had enough time to discuss the decision with his attorney. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
[PDF]
WI APP 160
truck No. 2006AP2804-CR 2 was involuntary because he had been seized by the wardens. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
truck No. 2006AP2804-CR 2 was involuntary because he had been seized by the wardens. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
Jodi Hurlburt v. OHIC Insurance Company
, and because the statute of limitations had expired. The Hurlburts argue that dismissal was erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31
, and because the statute of limitations had expired. The Hurlburts argue that dismissal was erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
advised him that he had no defense to the charges originally filed against him.[1] The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135724 - 2015-03-01
advised him that he had no defense to the charges originally filed against him.[1] The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135724 - 2015-03-01
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
Detective Charles Sosinski. Prior to this, Lloyd had reported two dead horses to James McCreedy,[2] a state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
Detective Charles Sosinski. Prior to this, Lloyd had reported two dead horses to James McCreedy,[2] a state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
while he was trying to “rebut the State’s allegation that [Olu A. Rhodes] had a motive to harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
while he was trying to “rebut the State’s allegation that [Olu A. Rhodes] had a motive to harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to Kayla on the grounds that Debra had failed to meet the conditions required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
parental rights to Kayla on the grounds that Debra had failed to meet the conditions required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
. When police were unable to draw information using the name Lilly had given, he was asked if he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9493 - 2017-09-19
. When police were unable to draw information using the name Lilly had given, he was asked if he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9493 - 2017-09-19