Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5391 - 5400 of 20860 for word.

State v. Ollie B. LeFlore
by his own words at the initial waiver hearing. His second attorney specifically advised him that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14211 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his disability. Hanson acknowledged that he could read the words on the monitor and that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431749 - 2021-09-28

Wintz Companies v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Rather, the parties' words and conduct created an implied contract that required Wintz to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8446 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
improperly. ¶9 Finally, while the trial court may not have used the exact words “mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19

Wendy Lee Miland v. Russell Atter
. The words "additional consideration" support DTCDD's assertion that the $50,000 constituted consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) and 971.165(1).1 In other words, his assertion that he would not have pled guilty is based on a legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14

State v. Suzann L. Turner
appropriate in a force-to-force situation and not in a words-to-force situation. We affirm the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15020 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tina Toborg and Bronson Toborg and Morgan Toborg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as to management and control, a claim Toborg now says she never pursued against Utterback. In other words, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15930 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerome M. Wywial
468 (1996). In other words, the primary purpose of the implied consent law is to protect innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10813 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
an alternate interpretation of the court’s statement and Grady does not mandate “magic words.”[5] See Grady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30