Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53901 - 53910 of 75348 for judgment for us.
Search results 53901 - 53910 of 75348 for judgment for us.
COURT OF APPEALS
could not be used for impeachment purposes, but Jerri’s prior conviction could be used. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
could not be used for impeachment purposes, but Jerri’s prior conviction could be used. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
robbery, one count of false imprisonment while using a dangerous weapon, and two counts of substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
robbery, one count of false imprisonment while using a dangerous weapon, and two counts of substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
[PDF]
State v. Delano L. Terrell
” as that term is used within the charging statute. Because we conclude that, based on the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25920 - 2017-09-21
” as that term is used within the charging statute. Because we conclude that, based on the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Edwin F. Haferman v. Mary K. Hebenstreit
, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact” that his mobile home constitutes personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5114 - 2017-09-19
, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact” that his mobile home constitutes personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5114 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id., ¶14. A prosecutor, however, is not required to share all useful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id., ¶14. A prosecutor, however, is not required to share all useful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
State v. David Allen Bruski
¶11 We use a two-step standard of review for constitutional search and seizure inquiries. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
¶11 We use a two-step standard of review for constitutional search and seizure inquiries. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
Edwin F. Haferman v. Mary K. Hebenstreit
As an initial matter, we clarify the scope of our review. On appeal, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5114 - 2005-03-31
As an initial matter, we clarify the scope of our review. On appeal, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
… for the offense.” We agree with the State. No. 2007AP814-CR 4 ¶5 This case requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
… for the offense.” We agree with the State. No. 2007AP814-CR 4 ¶5 This case requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
State v. James G. Luck
planned on using it. A police negotiator, who spoke with Luck by phone, confirmed that Luck possessed a 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4282 - 2005-03-31
planned on using it. A police negotiator, who spoke with Luck by phone, confirmed that Luck possessed a 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4282 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
address the parties’ dispute about whether the issues Morens raises are properly before us in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
address the parties’ dispute about whether the issues Morens raises are properly before us in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11