Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53911 - 53920 of 68259 for law.

State v. James H. Hornung
testified that he knew Jackomino to be an attorney who practiced criminal law. Despite this knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15085 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
exercise of discretion is outside the range of discretion delegated to the agency by law; is inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4103 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Watertown Plank Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53226 Karen Lueschow Attorney at Law 1222 E. Washington Ave
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214074 - 2018-06-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is satisfied. ¶13 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of law and fact. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI APP 3
interpretation, which is a question of law we review independently. County of Dodge v. Michael J.K., 209 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27540 - 2007-01-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was the lawful owner of the gun and sought its return pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 968.20 (2009–10), argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
not know Lynkiewicz was a law enforcement officer. In contrast, Ehret’s discussion of the pipe in his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20

COURT OF APPEALS
. The interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142744 - 2015-06-02

[PDF] State v. Aniton G. Thomas
that, together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, are sufficient to lead a reasonable law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6799 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21