Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53951 - 53960 of 61837 for judgment.
Search results 53951 - 53960 of 61837 for judgment.
[PDF]
WI App 95
concurrently. Judgments were entered accordingly. ¶7 Following sentencing and entry of the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84918 - 2014-09-15
concurrently. Judgments were entered accordingly. ¶7 Following sentencing and entry of the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84918 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense argument. ¶19 Fisher also argues that he was entitled to a default judgment or an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19
-defense argument. ¶19 Fisher also argues that he was entitled to a default judgment or an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: PATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: PATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mark Kivley v. The City of Milwaukee
the record and findings of the administrative board, here the common council, not the judgment and findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15417 - 2017-09-21
the record and findings of the administrative board, here the common council, not the judgment and findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15417 - 2017-09-21
WI App 122 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2173-CR Complete Titl...
-Acosta, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129281 - 2014-12-18
-Acosta, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129281 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
., one of the victims. The judgment of conviction provided restitution would be paid “[f]rom up to 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
., one of the victims. The judgment of conviction provided restitution would be paid “[f]rom up to 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
a judgment of divorce by a Virginia state court. The judgment of divorce granted the parties joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12662 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of divorce by a Virginia state court. The judgment of divorce granted the parties joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12662 - 2005-03-31
William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
judgment, including, over Schimmels’ objection, the following conclusions: 1. The 1913 Plat is valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24
judgment, including, over Schimmels’ objection, the following conclusions: 1. The 1913 Plat is valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
William Schleichert v. Columbia County
Early on, there was activity in the case centering on motions for summary judgment filed by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9390 - 2017-09-19
Early on, there was activity in the case centering on motions for summary judgment filed by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9390 - 2017-09-19