Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 541 - 550 of 68445 for did.
Search results 541 - 550 of 68445 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a “struggle” with one another, consisting of them rolling on the ground. Seever did not specify what caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
a “struggle” with one another, consisting of them rolling on the ground. Seever did not specify what caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jury heard from W.R. and W.B. Kropp did not testify. W.R. stated that in March 2012, he and Kropp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199633 - 2017-10-31
, the jury heard from W.R. and W.B. Kropp did not testify. W.R. stated that in March 2012, he and Kropp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199633 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not discuss the possibility of restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168204 - 2017-09-21
plea. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not discuss the possibility of restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168204 - 2017-09-21
State v. James A. Sybers
, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance of counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5360 - 2005-03-31
, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance of counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David G. Rodenkirch
did not have probable cause to arrest him. We agree that the arresting officer had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7017 - 2017-09-20
did not have probable cause to arrest him. We agree that the arresting officer had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7017 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] didn’t do,” that he felt pressured to plead, and that he did not understand the charges. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
] didn’t do,” that he felt pressured to plead, and that he did not understand the charges. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any explanation for the delinquent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17599 - 2017-09-21
responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any explanation for the delinquent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17599 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the police because No. 2007AP10-CR 2 the statements were coerced and the police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31769 - 2014-09-15
to the police because No. 2007AP10-CR 2 the statements were coerced and the police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31769 - 2014-09-15
James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
the delinquent July 2000 payment. Stelzer responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12
the delinquent July 2000 payment. Stelzer responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12