Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 541 - 550 of 68466 for did.

[PDF] State v. James A. Sybers
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
didn’t think so, but then he stated that if he did, it would have been an accident from giving a hug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
plea. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not discuss the possibility of restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168204 - 2017-09-21

State v. James A. Sybers
, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance of counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James A. Sybers
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19

James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
the delinquent July 2000 payment. Stelzer responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12

State v. Parish M. Golden
alternate jurors. Because we conclude that Golden did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, No. 2001AP1928-CRNM (Wis. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2001). Torres did not respond to counsel’s no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28279 - 2007-03-06

State v. David G. Rodenkirch
that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him. We agree that the arresting officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15