Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Michael F. W. v. Betty A. W.
recently divorced, with joint legal custody of Ryan. Primary placement is with [Ryan’s] mother, Betty A.[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
recently divorced, with joint legal custody of Ryan. Primary placement is with [Ryan’s] mother, Betty A.[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
a judgment of divorce by a Virginia state court. The judgment of divorce granted the parties joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of divorce by a Virginia state court. The judgment of divorce granted the parties joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sweet’s motion to sever his trial from that of a co-defendant. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
Sweet’s motion to sever his trial from that of a co-defendant. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
State v. David Villalobos
in a Kenosha County prosecution. Villalobos contends that a portion of his presentence custody in Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
in a Kenosha County prosecution. Villalobos contends that a portion of his presentence custody in Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Villalobos
custody in Racine County relating to a Racine County prosecution should have been credited to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8089 - 2017-09-19
custody in Racine County relating to a Racine County prosecution should have been credited to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8089 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until she was released from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36913 - 2009-06-24
. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until she was released from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36913 - 2009-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
the bench warrant. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36913 - 2014-09-15
the bench warrant. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36913 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pending cases. In the hallway outside the courtroom, Stilwell motioned to A.B., then stood and spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639572 - 2023-04-05
pending cases. In the hallway outside the courtroom, Stilwell motioned to A.B., then stood and spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639572 - 2023-04-05
Barbara R.K. v. James G.
of motions to modify a paternity judgment with respect to custody and placement of Danielle L.G., the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2005-03-31
of motions to modify a paternity judgment with respect to custody and placement of Danielle L.G., the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara R.K. v. James G.
BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out of motions to modify a paternity judgment with respect to custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3933 - 2017-09-20
BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out of motions to modify a paternity judgment with respect to custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3933 - 2017-09-20