Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”[2] (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85153 - 2012-07-23
the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”[2] (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85153 - 2012-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to challenge the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”2 (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85153 - 2014-09-15
to challenge the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”2 (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85153 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 146
in Waukesha County because no warrant was obtained, and to suppress material seized later from a residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28959 - 2014-09-15
in Waukesha County because no warrant was obtained, and to suppress material seized later from a residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28959 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 146
Parcel Service (UPS) facility in Waukesha County because no warrant was obtained, and to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28959 - 2007-06-26
Parcel Service (UPS) facility in Waukesha County because no warrant was obtained, and to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28959 - 2007-06-26
State v. Martin J. Zielinski
Thomas Carr obtained a search warrant for Zielinski’s residence. The warrant was based on the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
Thomas Carr obtained a search warrant for Zielinski’s residence. The warrant was based on the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Israel Saldana
staleness of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment and the order. Saldana was convicted for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
staleness of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment and the order. Saldana was convicted for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm. Fields was charged with possession of THC as a second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117806 - 2014-07-29
the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm. Fields was charged with possession of THC as a second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117806 - 2014-07-29
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
that a warrantless blood test falls under the “exigent circumstances” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
that a warrantless blood test falls under the “exigent circumstances” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
3 exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement because of the rapid dissipation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
3 exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement because of the rapid dissipation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the scene became aware that Eichman had an active arrest warrant from La Crosse County. Ely’s supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604935 - 2022-12-29
on the scene became aware that Eichman had an active arrest warrant from La Crosse County. Ely’s supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604935 - 2022-12-29