Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 68485 for did.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph H. Gray
. Gray was coherent during the interrogation, did not ask for counsel, and confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
. Gray was coherent during the interrogation, did not ask for counsel, and confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, alleging that he did not validly waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
, alleging that he did not validly waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Cox for impaired driving. I conclude that he did, and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Cox for impaired driving. I conclude that he did, and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Belleau did not have information that a reportable accident had taken place and, therefore, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132172 - 2017-09-21
Belleau did not have information that a reportable accident had taken place and, therefore, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie P.
on the petition for termination of parental rights — Ronnie did not appear because he was incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
on the petition for termination of parental rights — Ronnie did not appear because he was incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on Green’s automobile. Green contends that the court erred in ordering the IID because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921333 - 2025-03-05
on Green’s automobile. Green contends that the court erred in ordering the IID because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921333 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained at the hearing: I went over self-defense with my client. I did do that. It’s part of the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94401 - 2014-09-15
explained at the hearing: I went over self-defense with my client. I did do that. It’s part of the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94401 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2208 2 the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2208 2 the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
State v. David A. Prusinski
, and did not make his first court appearance until Monday, April 17, 1995. On April 13 and 14, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11586 - 2005-03-31
, and did not make his first court appearance until Monday, April 17, 1995. On April 13 and 14, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11586 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
of Swenson’s fear of spinal collapse should not have been admitted because the evidence did not satisfy a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
of Swenson’s fear of spinal collapse should not have been admitted because the evidence did not satisfy a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31