Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 57315 for id.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 57315 for id.
[PDF]
County of Iowa v. Brock T. Bilse
or violated a traffic statute. See id. The circumstances do not have to demonstrate proof beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15435 - 2017-09-21
or violated a traffic statute. See id. The circumstances do not have to demonstrate proof beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15435 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the parent’s rights are paramount,” and the petitioner bears the burden of establishing unfitness. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132014 - 2017-09-21
, “the parent’s rights are paramount,” and the petitioner bears the burden of establishing unfitness. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132014 - 2017-09-21
County of Iowa v. Brock T. Bilse
circumstances, would believe that the defendant committed a crime or violated a traffic statute. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15435 - 2005-03-31
circumstances, would believe that the defendant committed a crime or violated a traffic statute. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be tried fairly.” Id. at 347. We noted “[t]here will be cases, however, where the fact of amnesia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968543 - 2025-06-11
to be tried fairly.” Id. at 347. We noted “[t]here will be cases, however, where the fact of amnesia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968543 - 2025-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Kyle D. Willenkamp
." Id. at 772. However, the Court held that withdrawing blood from an arrestee who had refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2376 - 2017-09-19
." Id. at 772. However, the Court held that withdrawing blood from an arrestee who had refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2376 - 2017-09-19
State v. Pervis Merritt
as a matter of right because of the denial of a constitutional right. Id. The defendant must show: "(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of right because of the denial of a constitutional right. Id. The defendant must show: "(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. “However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27143 - 2006-11-13
court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. “However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27143 - 2006-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that issue, as the parties’ respective arguments were not made in the circuit court. Id., ¶3. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118091 - 2014-07-28
that issue, as the parties’ respective arguments were not made in the circuit court. Id., ¶3. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118091 - 2014-07-28
State v. Jason M. Sicard
serious that he or she was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4162 - 2005-03-31
serious that he or she was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of that agreement are normally questions of fact and are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28620 - 2014-09-15
of that agreement are normally questions of fact and are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28620 - 2014-09-15