Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 73010 for we.

COURT OF APPEALS
this stop. For the reasons we explain below, we conclude the circuit properly denied the motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61616 - 2011-03-23

[PDF] State v. James Bessert
ruling denying his motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment. 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3899 - 2017-09-20

State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
Armstrong opinion, we modify footnote 38 of the opinion at 223 Wis. 2d 331, 369-70, 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In May 1997, after pleading guilty, Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20

[PDF] Patrick McMahon v. Terry W. Ryan
that Parrott destroyed property belonging to him. McMahon cross-appeals. We affirm. ¶2 McMahon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5428 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of OWI. We conclude that the circuit court employed the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50828 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916623 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] State v. Jose Luis Martinez
to deliver controlled substances in Wisconsin. We reverse the order, except as to the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14743 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135072 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
of Jerry J. Garceau’s termination benefits package. In a prior appeal, we remanded for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3934 - 2017-09-20