Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 20931 for word.

Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
in net worth. The word "shall" is presumed mandatory when it appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 131
to the specified penalty. (Emphasis added.) The word “otherwise” makes clear that the statute is not listing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33501 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
," it provides that surplus "shall not" be deemed to include an increase in net worth. The word "shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7701 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Randall E. Baures v. North Shore Fire Department
served as Chair or President of the Brown Deer Fire and Police Commission, explained that “the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5487 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 172
Marks said “something like that’s what you get; I told you about putting your hands on me, words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56996 - 2014-09-15

Randall E. Baures v. North Shore Fire Department
that “the word ‘certificate[,]’ as opposed to ‘certification[,]’ … in the Section heading” of the Job Description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5487 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
] in the subdivision paragraphs of [§ 51.20(1)(a)2.]” D.J.W., 391 Wis. 2d 231, ¶41. In other words, “even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552097 - 2022-08-09

[PDF] State v. Kristan S. Fisch
or the police who suggested what was to be said to the suspect; in other words, was the citizen, in essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4645 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. Keller, 214 Wis. 2d 32, 37, 571 N.W.2d 182 (Ct. App. 1997) (we give words in a contract their common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28460 - 2014-09-15

William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
their release was based on the pro se work Ledford did in the court of appeals. In other words, Ledford had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-03-31