Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54001 - 54010 of 83216 for case code.
Search results 54001 - 54010 of 83216 for case code.
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
Nonetheless, we point out that the cases cited by Laura, including those cases indirectly cited by reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
Nonetheless, we point out that the cases cited by Laura, including those cases indirectly cited by reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
[PDF]
Wisconsin Department of Transportation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
and remand the matter for further proceedings. The facts are undisputed. This is an eminent domain case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11677 - 2017-09-19
and remand the matter for further proceedings. The facts are undisputed. This is an eminent domain case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11677 - 2017-09-19
State v. Salaam P. Johnson
.2d 739, 742 (Ct. App. 1994). The trial court reasoned that a misidentification in one case says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9317 - 2005-03-31
.2d 739, 742 (Ct. App. 1994). The trial court reasoned that a misidentification in one case says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9317 - 2005-03-31
Jon A. Haas v. Vance R. Stark
. Furthermore, Stark did not file an appearance in the case until over a month after Haas moved for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31
. Furthermore, Stark did not file an appearance in the case until over a month after Haas moved for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31
Barbara S. Horlacher v. Zoura S. Drexler
(1979). ¶4 In this case, there was more than sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4862 - 2005-03-31
(1979). ¶4 In this case, there was more than sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 340, 761 N.W.2d 15 (we decide cases on the narrowest possible ground). “This court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 340, 761 N.W.2d 15 (we decide cases on the narrowest possible ground). “This court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the present case is the ownership of Essential Homecare. Lor contends that as a 50% shareholder of Essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121816 - 2014-09-15
in the present case is the ownership of Essential Homecare. Lor contends that as a 50% shareholder of Essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121816 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian M.
, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis court extended Davis’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6457 - 2017-09-19
, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis court extended Davis’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6457 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
each party to retain his or her individual property. See Wis. Stat. § 767.61(3)(L). In Eleanor’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
each party to retain his or her individual property. See Wis. Stat. § 767.61(3)(L). In Eleanor’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Shalamar Bursinger
and lower levels of the home. He was charged as noted above and entered a not guilty plea. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19778 - 2017-09-21
and lower levels of the home. He was charged as noted above and entered a not guilty plea. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19778 - 2017-09-21