Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54031 - 54040 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 54031 - 54040 of 65039 for timed.
State v. Tyree Goodrich
no contest pleas, the State agreed to join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7315 - 2005-03-31
no contest pleas, the State agreed to join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tyree Goodrich
no contest pleas, the State agreed to join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31
no contest pleas, the State agreed to join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marisol A.
was separate and distinct as to time, place and circumstances. Accordingly, this court cannot conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2005-08-01
was separate and distinct as to time, place and circumstances. Accordingly, this court cannot conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2005-08-01
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
" in the brief time since reaching adulthood, the type of offenses and the amount of cocaine he possessed, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
" in the brief time since reaching adulthood, the type of offenses and the amount of cocaine he possessed, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the first time that the supreme court’s opinion in Dubose applies retroactively to his case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
for the first time that the supreme court’s opinion in Dubose applies retroactively to his case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
money financing from Landmark in the amount of $16,791.98, at which time the agreement was assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
money financing from Landmark in the amount of $16,791.98, at which time the agreement was assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
in time to include” in the PSI. The absence of that information from the PSI did not violate Mosley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33843 - 2014-09-15
in time to include” in the PSI. The absence of that information from the PSI did not violate Mosley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33843 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of there to go do that.” ¶11 I reject this argument because it is made for the first time on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91385 - 2013-01-09
of there to go do that.” ¶11 I reject this argument because it is made for the first time on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91385 - 2013-01-09
CA Blank Order
reflects, however, that Warchol confirmed that he had enough time to review the PSI and that his counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25
reflects, however, that Warchol confirmed that he had enough time to review the PSI and that his counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the offense, the court observed that Nickel had slammed his son’s head against the wall multiple times while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
of the offense, the court observed that Nickel had slammed his son’s head against the wall multiple times while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19