Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54041 - 54050 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 54041 - 54050 of 61694 for judgment.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidentiary test of his breath or blood was unreasonable. This order resulted in a judgment imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
evidentiary test of his breath or blood was unreasonable. This order resulted in a judgment imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
State v. David L. Gray
, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. ¶3 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. ¶3 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
not respond. This court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Webb, No. 2006AP1879
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
not respond. This court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Webb, No. 2006AP1879
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing the record, this court affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Ferguson, No. 96-1164-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
reviewing the record, this court affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Ferguson, No. 96-1164-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
State v. Armond N. Henderson
of the record. After such, we concluded that Henderson’s judgment should be affirmed because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
of the record. After such, we concluded that Henderson’s judgment should be affirmed because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility of the evidence on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42500 - 2009-10-21
not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility of the evidence on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42500 - 2009-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment already ordered No. 2020AP1513 3 the parties’ agreed-upon placement arrangement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
judgment already ordered No. 2020AP1513 3 the parties’ agreed-upon placement arrangement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178958 - 2017-09-21
reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149693 - 2017-09-21
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149693 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Central Wisconsin Inspection Service, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Industry
, in the judgment of the department, the rules or standards [regulating storage of flammable and No. 96-2174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11180 - 2017-09-19
, in the judgment of the department, the rules or standards [regulating storage of flammable and No. 96-2174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11180 - 2017-09-19