Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54051 - 54060 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
as an example of a state whose law she was effectively directed to violate, but our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28347 - 2007-03-07

State v. Craig Chenal
to the trial court’s pontification are aspersions unsupported by the record. Demonstrating disrespect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3745 - 2005-03-31

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
calling himself “Dude.” The transaction was recorded. Douglas was arrested and charged after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2011-10-17

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14957 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth F. Krantz
dismissed, 465 U.S. 1016 (1984), we have absolutely no factual record with which to measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9499 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pierre Davis
, every case stands on its own circumstances. Here, in light of Davis's record on prior probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31

City of Fort Atkinson v. Ronald A. Lendabarker
. The circuit court reviewed the record and affirmed the judgment of the municipal court on January 24, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10501 - 2014-01-29

Paul Evers v. Everett Fryer
to § 752.31(2), Stats. [2] No written judgment appears of record. This court construes the February 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8851 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy A. Heisz
decision, we will independently review the record to determine whether there is any reasonable basis upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7259 - 2005-03-31

Martial Ledvina v. Scott Puksich
to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). ¶9 The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7376 - 2005-03-31