Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54051 - 54060 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54051 - 54060 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327953 - 2021-01-27
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327953 - 2021-01-27
State v. Barry D. Stamps
statements are consistent with this theory.[1] ¶7 Moreover, the record does not show that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31
statements are consistent with this theory.[1] ¶7 Moreover, the record does not show that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921364 - 2025-03-05
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921364 - 2025-03-05
Edward A. Faas v. Ervin H. Nuttelman, Jr.
, however. Instead, this was a recorded transfer of property rights. Therefore, the intended location
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5137 - 2005-03-31
, however. Instead, this was a recorded transfer of property rights. Therefore, the intended location
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5137 - 2005-03-31
Gerald Huffman v. Dorla Huffman
is not supported by the record. The trial court specifically stated that it had considered the fact that Gerald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15605 - 2005-03-31
is not supported by the record. The trial court specifically stated that it had considered the fact that Gerald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard S. Dammon
. A defendant is entitled to a hearing on the motion unless the motion and the files and records of the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
. A defendant is entitled to a hearing on the motion unless the motion and the files and records of the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
John C. O'Neill v. Arthur N. Krattiger
, and “recorded building and use restrictions and covenants.” The restriction here was not a governmental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31
, and “recorded building and use restrictions and covenants.” The restriction here was not a governmental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confirming the sheriff’s sale of their foreclosed property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106687 - 2017-09-21
confirming the sheriff’s sale of their foreclosed property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106687 - 2017-09-21