Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 16935 for "48.44" +50.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a crime liability, it was “required to present evidence of a single, large transaction of more than 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08

2010 WI APP 92
of limitations presents a question of law we review independently. State v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, ¶14, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51290 - 2010-07-27

State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
probable cause to arrest Hnanicek for violating the ordinance.[4] See State v. Paszek, 50 Wis.2d 619, 624
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
No contest plea entered. 1:50 pm Deft enters plea of no contest Deft completed plea questionnaire Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68978 - 2011-08-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:20:50-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65044 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the funds at a rate of 50% from Mullins’ accounts. However, as noted above, the judgments of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226705 - 2018-11-06

State v. Kareem Q. Curry
that the defendant is not entitled to relief. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6742 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lamont Williams
State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
); State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 249-50, 557 N.W.2d 245 (1996). However, whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04

CA Blank Order
. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Cady, 50 Wis. 2d 540, 550, 185 N.W.2d 306 (1971) (judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117400 - 2014-07-22