Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 69109 for he.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 69109 for he.
Frontsheet
was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1969. He practices family law in Milwaukee. He has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94426 - 2013-03-21
was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1969. He practices family law in Milwaukee. He has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94426 - 2013-03-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Lee
in denying his motion seeking to suppress evidence. He claims the investigating police officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11215 - 2017-09-19
in denying his motion seeking to suppress evidence. He claims the investigating police officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11215 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Koch asked the passenger, Renfro, if he was carrying a weapon. Renfro responded that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246664 - 2019-09-17
Koch asked the passenger, Renfro, if he was carrying a weapon. Renfro responded that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246664 - 2019-09-17
County of Green v. Geoffrey J. Stout
privileges for seven months and ordered him to undergo an alcohol assessment. He argues that, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11673 - 2005-03-31
privileges for seven months and ordered him to undergo an alcohol assessment. He argues that, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11673 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricardo Glover
(1999-2000).[1] He argues on appeal that the trial court which convicted him lacked both personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
(1999-2000).[1] He argues on appeal that the trial court which convicted him lacked both personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary because he did not understand the elements of the charge against him. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
, and voluntary because he did not understand the elements of the charge against him. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
an agreement that he was previously unable to prove and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39258 - 2014-09-15
an agreement that he was previously unable to prove and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39258 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eduardo D. Handal
because of a plan to kill his wife. His defense at trial was that he was coerced into taking the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2763 - 2005-03-31
because of a plan to kill his wife. His defense at trial was that he was coerced into taking the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2763 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger Lenox
PER CURIAM. Roger Lenox challenges the sentence he received on his conviction for second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Roger Lenox challenges the sentence he received on his conviction for second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
name, which he identifies as his “Common Law/Spiritual Name.” We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73388 - 2014-09-15
name, which he identifies as his “Common Law/Spiritual Name.” We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73388 - 2014-09-15