Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 65135 for or b.

Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
to a duplex residence in the development violated § 196.495(1m)(b), Stats., and ordered removal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12077 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
in the development violated § 196.495(1m)(b), STATS., and ordered removal of the offending line. Section 196.495
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12077 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jack P. Lindgren
of Attachment B, a profile of preferential child molesters, as the justification for the search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6668 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Condor Energy, Inc. v. Richard A. Malone
and ownership rights to the property. More particularly: …. B. Property titled in both parties’ names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3854 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jack P. Lindgren
of Attachment B, a profile of preferential child molesters, as the justification for the search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6669 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standards in § 51.20(1)(a)2.b.-e. ¶6 The circuit court held a hearing on the County’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. §§ 948.02(1)(e), 939.62(2m)(b)2. (2017-18).1 The State alleged that Miller intentionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239336 - 2019-04-18

[PDF] WI 15
within a reasonable time, as required under Wis. Stat. § 218.0116(1)(i)1.b. The Division determined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47854 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
the circumstances specified in s. 938.183(1)(a), (am), (ar), (b), or (c), whichever is applicable," if the adult
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117785 - 2017-09-21

Condor Energy, Inc. v. Richard A. Malone
(2)(b) and 806.15(4), Janet was liable for only ten percent of Richard’s judgment debt, plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3854 - 2005-03-31