Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54171 - 54180 of 82588 for simple case.

COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 The historical facts of this case are undisputed. In 1976, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79675 - 2012-03-19

State v. Peter A. Moss
and that Wis. Stat. § 968.13 did not authorize search warrants in civil forfeiture cases. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31

State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
in this case may thus be distinguished on the same grounds. ¶11 We therefore presume the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2893 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
forecast of the actual damages only if Fouche never made a single payment, which is not the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33909 - 2008-09-02

[PDF] State v. Floyd Carter
and who may or may not be available to try this case.” B. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, or subjectively biased). Most of the cases Potvine cites in his brief involve claims that the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126125 - 2014-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
for the permanent modification other than … three temporary payments which under every other HAMP case I’ve seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30

COURT OF APPEALS
enhancers were dismissed. ¶3 Ryan was convicted and the case proceeded to sentencing. Ryan faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28

[PDF] NOTICE
. Consent (or cooperation) is not a defense to statutory rape; when we use that terminology in this case we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
and affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 This court has previously summarized the relevant facts of James’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261858 - 2020-05-27