Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54181 - 54190 of 75347 for judgment for us.

[PDF] State v. Barry D. Faber
, however lewd or obscene. The term “sexually explicit conduct,” as used in § 948.055, STATS., means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14181 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robin K. v. Lamanda M.
on appeal concerns the applicable standard used to award guardianship of a child over a parent’s objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7392 - 2017-09-20

Certification
. But it is not readily apparent to us why it matters whether a judge makes a post-plea offer or instead warns a defendant
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32324 - 2008-04-02

Terrance James Shaw v. Department of Corrections
raised is whether denying the name change petition violated the Religion Land Use and Institutionalized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7202 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
brief. Dane County is not a party to the appeal and informed us by letter that it did not wish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184005 - 2017-09-21

Lori L. Johansen v. William J. Johansen
of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reaches a conclusion a reasonable judge could reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18998 - 2005-07-13

[PDF] NOTICE
background information that allows us to understand the context of his arguments, and the arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28271 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, but that the petition was returned to him on June 7, 2011, because he had used an outdated address for the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101922 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, Josellis’s brief does not provide clear background information that allows us to understand the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28271 - 2007-02-28

State v. Ricki D. Bunnell
the first test was under the prohibited blood alcohol concentration. However, our decision did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31