Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5421 - 5430 of 25709 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 5421 - 5430 of 25709 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Charles Jeremiah Jones
to a search warrant. Jones contends there was no probable cause to support the search warrant. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21563 - 2006-02-27
to a search warrant. Jones contends there was no probable cause to support the search warrant. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21563 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jeremiah Jones
in a search of his home, which was conducted pursuant to a search No. 2005AP2197-CR 2 warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21563 - 2017-09-21
in a search of his home, which was conducted pursuant to a search No. 2005AP2197-CR 2 warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seized from Burger’s vehicle without a warrant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
seized from Burger’s vehicle without a warrant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to and within the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117806 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to and within the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117806 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
seized pursuant to a search warrant No. 2009AP2532-CR 2 and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
seized pursuant to a search warrant No. 2009AP2532-CR 2 and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Howard
that the facts alleged by Howard are insufficient to warrant relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
that the facts alleged by Howard are insufficient to warrant relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the charges against him was seized and admitted pursuant to valid warrants and a broad but voluntary consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
the charges against him was seized and admitted pursuant to valid warrants and a broad but voluntary consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant at his home. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant at his home. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Janke
and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds of misrepresentation or omission of a material fact. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds of misrepresentation or omission of a material fact. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31