Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54261 - 54270 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54261 - 54270 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the record “to determine if the circuit court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141484 - 2017-09-21
). We review the record “to determine if the circuit court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141484 - 2017-09-21
State v. A. David McCormack
decision, we will affirm its discretionary decision if our independent review of the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8192 - 2005-03-31
decision, we will affirm its discretionary decision if our independent review of the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Joseph Chaulklin
to the record that supports the representation, Chaulklin's brief on this appeal contends that his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8858 - 2017-09-19
to the record that supports the representation, Chaulklin's brief on this appeal contends that his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8858 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tuchalski does not point to any evidence in the record establishing that the court made the “convicted drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2014-02-11
. Tuchalski does not point to any evidence in the record establishing that the court made the “convicted drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2014-02-11
CA Blank Order
or on the issue of informed consent. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23
or on the issue of informed consent. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
The record facts indicate that Heimerl saw Frier park her car in front of an alley entrance and remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
The record facts indicate that Heimerl saw Frier park her car in front of an alley entrance and remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Waters
not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses no basis for believing that the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses no basis for believing that the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Waters
not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses no basis for believing that the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5751 - 2017-09-19
not inflammatory or inherently prejudicial. The record discloses no basis for believing that the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5751 - 2017-09-19