Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54271 - 54280 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54271 - 54280 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667896 - 2023-06-15
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667896 - 2023-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s analysis and to independently review the entire circuit court record to determine if there are any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146395 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s analysis and to independently review the entire circuit court record to determine if there are any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Wizner
satisfies this threshold is the additional inquiry of whether the record establishes a valid plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
satisfies this threshold is the additional inquiry of whether the record establishes a valid plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after proceedings on remand from this court. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138786 - 2017-09-21
after proceedings on remand from this court. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard Stoeckel
stated “yes, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
stated “yes, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
State v. Priest Johnson
pro se, but insisted on discharging counsel, which the record reflects he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14
pro se, but insisted on discharging counsel, which the record reflects he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing. Id. at 5-6. After an independent review of the record and consideration of counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
at sentencing. Id. at 5-6. After an independent review of the record and consideration of counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
State v. Marshall Jones
receives and makes calls, a cassette tape recording of these calls that is spliced together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
receives and makes calls, a cassette tape recording of these calls that is spliced together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09

