Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
and the Wisconsin Family Court Commissioner Association filed a joint petition to amend Supreme Court Rule 70.14
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61466 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 52
(2)(a), entered on his no-contest plea. He also appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35951 - 2009-05-11

[PDF] WI APP 52
2008AP1765-CR 2 his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be able to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35951 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
County circuit court. In addition, in the Columbia County case Attorney Bryant also filed a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115395 - 2014-06-23

[PDF] Comment on Supreme Court Rule petition 07-11
Joint Legislative Council’s Special Committee on State-Tribal Relations submitted a memorandum
/supreme/docs/0711commentnielsen3.pdf - 2015-10-01

[PDF] Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
“information and belief,” is “a joint venture” of JTMK-Pabst and Highland Best. JTMK-Pabst is described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21

Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
and belief,” is “a joint venture” of JTMK-Pabst and Highland Best. JTMK-Pabst is described as “an affiliate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21368 - 2006-03-22

State v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
.[1] The Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians appeals a circuit court order denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16189 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
motion to transfer jurisdiction of a WIS. STAT. ch. 48 proceeding involving a fifteen-year-old band
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16189 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Julia M. Meyer v. Joseph D. Meyer
circumstances, circuit courts are required to "presume that joint legal custody is in the best interest
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17474 - 2017-09-21