Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 74626 for a ha.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 74626 for a ha.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the State has jurisdiction to charge for second or subsequent OWI’s, Pettis asserts, his judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36120 - 2014-09-15
the State has jurisdiction to charge for second or subsequent OWI’s, Pettis asserts, his judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36120 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nothing in the record indicates that the Property has ever been exempt from taxation. ¶3 On June 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181541 - 2017-09-21
. Nothing in the record indicates that the Property has ever been exempt from taxation. ¶3 On June 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181541 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anne C. Hepperla v. John D. Puchner
) and Puchner were divorced in 1992. Since 1994, Puchner has filed twenty cases in the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14847 - 2017-09-21
) and Puchner were divorced in 1992. Since 1994, Puchner has filed twenty cases in the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
, doesn’t really care whether anybody is inconvenienced. His attitude toward this Court has always been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
, doesn’t really care whether anybody is inconvenienced. His attitude toward this Court has always been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
Keith Hitzke v. Jan Easterday
court ruled that the Statute of Frauds did not apply, and she appeals that holding. This court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18651 - 2005-06-21
court ruled that the Statute of Frauds did not apply, and she appeals that holding. This court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18651 - 2005-06-21
State v. Diane F.
responsibility. Specifically, the petition alleged: [Diane] has failed to meet the conditions established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7075 - 2005-03-31
responsibility. Specifically, the petition alleged: [Diane] has failed to meet the conditions established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7075 - 2005-03-31
Ramiro Estrada v. State
. It provides in pertinent part: General rule of privilege. A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
. It provides in pertinent part: General rule of privilege. A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2012AP1198-NM In re the commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2012AP1198-NM In re the commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Diane F.
, and failure to assume parental responsibility. Specifically, the petition alleged: [Diane] has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7075 - 2017-09-20
, and failure to assume parental responsibility. Specifically, the petition alleged: [Diane] has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7075 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that are ineligible. It’s listed what vehicles are. The City has not proven that the vehicle cited is on that list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36945 - 2009-06-29
that are ineligible. It’s listed what vehicles are. The City has not proven that the vehicle cited is on that list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36945 - 2009-06-29