Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 98499 for court records search online.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 98499 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
court reviewed the facts set forth in the record and found “that the search was a police search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
court reviewed the facts set forth in the record and found “that the search was a police search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will search the record for reasons to sustain the [circuit] court’s exercise of discretion.” Lofthus v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08
will search the record for reasons to sustain the [circuit] court’s exercise of discretion.” Lofthus v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31759 - 2008-02-12
if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31759 - 2008-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 898 (where a trial court’s findings of fact are based on disputed testimony and a video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98790 - 2013-07-02
.2d 898 (where a trial court’s findings of fact are based on disputed testimony and a video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98790 - 2013-07-02
[PDF]
State v. April Dakins
. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 328.21(3). We conclude that the record supports the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10890 - 2017-09-20
. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 328.21(3). We conclude that the record supports the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10890 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 13, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 13, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as an argument, it has no merit. The record reflects that the circuit court considered and rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336928 - 2021-02-19
as an argument, it has no merit. The record reflects that the circuit court considered and rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336928 - 2021-02-19
[PDF]
WI APP 109
of a search warrant we are “‘limited to the record established before the court at the time it issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32971 - 2014-09-15
of a search warrant we are “‘limited to the record established before the court at the time it issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32971 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 22, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 22, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31097 - 2007-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31097 - 2007-12-11