Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 57346 for id.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 57346 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances.” Id. ¶4 A traffic stop is reasonable if supported by reasonable suspicion that a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413132 - 2021-08-19
the circumstances.” Id. ¶4 A traffic stop is reasonable if supported by reasonable suspicion that a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413132 - 2021-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if there is a manifest disregard of the law, or if the award itself is illegal or violates strong public policy.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34345 - 2008-10-20
, or if there is a manifest disregard of the law, or if the award itself is illegal or violates strong public policy.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34345 - 2008-10-20
State v. David J. Arnold
, 584 N.W.2d 553 (Ct. App. 1998). We review with deference the trial court’s factual findings. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
, 584 N.W.2d 553 (Ct. App. 1998). We review with deference the trial court’s factual findings. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon P. Torok
regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine whether probable cause existed. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine whether probable cause existed. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a habeas petition that alleged ineffective assistance by appellate counsel. Id., ¶1. The delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178114 - 2017-09-21
of a habeas petition that alleged ineffective assistance by appellate counsel. Id., ¶1. The delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178114 - 2017-09-21
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion. Id. A traffic stop is generally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion. Id. A traffic stop is generally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and conducted an independent review of the Record. Id. We examined whether the plea colloquy satisfied WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
and conducted an independent review of the Record. Id. We examined whether the plea colloquy satisfied WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Findings of fact include the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89675 - 2012-11-26
will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Findings of fact include the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89675 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
State v. Craig T. Bates
to be for legitimate reasons or for a dilatory purpose; and other relevant factors. See id. at 339 n.2, 536 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
to be for legitimate reasons or for a dilatory purpose; and other relevant factors. See id. at 339 n.2, 536 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15
court’s findings of fact will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15