Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54371 - 54380 of 57675 for id.

State v. Ronald V. McCallum
exercise its discretion. Id. at 250, 471 N.W.2d at 602. Discretion based on an erroneous application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9139 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David Lang v. Dianne J. Seibert
at any stage when justice so requires. Id. A motion to amend pleadings is addressed to trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10736 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Michael Bartz
or unjustifiable basis for the exercise of the trial court’s discretion. See id. The motion and argument made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frankie Kirk Rottier v. John Edward Walsh
or uncertain.” Id. at 70, 264 N.W.2d at 281. But Rottier is not asking for specific performance of anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14977 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, however, to consider the sentence imposed on an accomplice. See id. at 188-89. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34703 - 2008-11-24

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. ¶10 The Escalona-Naranjo rules apply with equal force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04

[PDF] State v. Angel E.
and are partly subjective. Id. at 864, 537 N.W.2d at 51. When the State warns a parent that his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9886 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily despite the defect in the plea colloquy. Id. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10

Dietrich Schnappup v. Scott J. Yauck
is appropriate. Id.; Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2003-04).[1] Here, only a question of law is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18542 - 2005-06-14

State v. Jesse Ruiz
hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310; Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489, 497, 195 N.W.2d 629 (1972
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05