Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54381 - 54390 of 84450 for wi.

COURT OF APPEALS
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23

Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
review de novo. See Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis.2d 293, 298-299, 488 N.W.2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8578 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Mentzel
-2612-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 1996). On December 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78917 - 2012-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Randall S. Rueth
. State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct. App. 1993). Implied Consent Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11299 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2013AP2130 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121184 - 2014-09-15

Village of Deerfield v. Curtis J. Philipp
as otherwise provided … by statute.”[2] Philipp cites State v. Mullis, 81 Wis.2d 454, 260 N.W.2d 696 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11782 - 2005-03-31

Village of Deerfield v.
as otherwise provided … by statute.”[2] Philipp cites State v. Mullis, 81 Wis.2d 454, 260 N.W.2d 696 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11781 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Knova K. Green
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3098 - 2017-09-20