Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for resentencing. Christ argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137483 - 2015-03-16
postconviction motion for resentencing. Christ argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137483 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
. No. 03-0429-CR 2 court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on a failure to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
. No. 03-0429-CR 2 court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on a failure to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, reasoning that Panick’s 2008 letter to the district attorney’s office failed to meet all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76098 - 2014-09-15
motion, reasoning that Panick’s 2008 letter to the district attorney’s office failed to meet all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
(1m)(h)3. (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44876 - 2014-09-15
(1m)(h)3. (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
the circuit court’s denial of his two motions to No. 2023AP290-CR 2 suppress. Clark raises two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=911472 - 2025-02-06
the circuit court’s denial of his two motions to No. 2023AP290-CR 2 suppress. Clark raises two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=911472 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 § 943.32(2), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Brock argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52601 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 § 943.32(2), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Brock argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52601 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Brock argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Brock argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was taken into custody. The circuit court denied the motion after the State argued that the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
was taken into custody. The circuit court denied the motion after the State argued that the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19