Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 19926 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".

COURT OF APPEALS
and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498, 501 (1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52316 - 2010-07-19

[PDF] NOTICE
a totality of the circumstances test. See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36796 - 2014-09-15

State v. Mark H. Brooks
, which is an objective question. See State v. Williamson, 113 Wis.2d 389, 401, 335 N.W.2d 814, 820 (1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kelly J. Kloss
, and are not “penalties.” See e.g., State v. Killebrew, 115 Wis.2d 243, 251, 340 N.W.2d 470 (1983). Second, the foregoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
’ easement was first created in 1983 by the Ciszeks, predecessors in interest to the current owners of Lot 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35921 - 2009-03-18

[PDF] State v. Raul M. Castro
418, 426 n.4, 338 N.W.2d 474, 478 (1983). Fingerprint evidence is treated like any other item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8302 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in 1983 by the Ciszeks, predecessors in interest to the current owners of Lot 3, the Romanos and Nelsons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35921 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December
was denied and the Court of Appeals upheld this ruling, citing a 1983 Wisconsin Supreme Court case3
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Roger and Donna Anhalt v. Cities and Villages Mutual Insurance Company
) deprivation of property in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2001). We conclude that summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3451 - 2017-09-19

Roger and Donna Anhalt v. Cities and Villages Mutual Insurance Company
) inverse condemnation, (4) waste, and (5) deprivation of property in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3451 - 2005-03-31