Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 65039 for timed.

[PDF] State v. Donald R. Wooden
is being imposed. Section 939.62, STATS. The five-year period shall be tolled during “time which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13619 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for a couple of minutes. No one exited the vehicle during that time. The officer repositioned his squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103926 - 2013-11-06

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James O'Neil
not disclose to his law firm at the time he separated from employment. In addition, he retained a check
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16968 - 2017-09-21

Scott Alan Ludtke v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
and twenty-four days remaining on his sentence. Ludtke requested and received a “good time forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15997 - 2005-03-31

LeAnne Arbs v. Dianna D. Nelson
at the time of my death shall pass to my wife provided she survives me by thirty (30) days; however, if my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5537 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shawn Michael D. v. Tracy K.
custody or an order of physical placement where the modification would substantially alter the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12269 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was commenced on September 17, 2010, was timely. BACKGROUND ¶3 On September 17, 2010, James filed suit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105160 - 2013-12-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court to award him 407 additional days of sentence credit for time that he spent in custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674522 - 2023-07-06

[PDF] NOTICE
with transcripts and other documents. The trial court denied the motion, explaining that: Where the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27237 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
on December 31, 2001, and divorced December 9, 2008.[1] At the time of the divorce, both parties were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55968 - 2010-10-25