Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54441 - 54450 of 61694 for judgment.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
’ claims, this court affirmed Mathews’ judgment of conviction. Based on our review of the materials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013580 - 2025-09-25

[PDF] State v. D.L.S.
N.W.2d 905 (1979). Nos. 03-0296 & 03-0297 5 judgment.” Id. To prove prejudice, D.L.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6125 - 2017-09-19

Mt. Hardscrabble, Inc. v. T.H.E. Insurance Company
PER CURIAM. Mt. Hardscrabble, Inc., appeals an order dismissing its declaratory judgment action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20467 - 2005-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judgment or order[.]” Habeas corpus relief is not available if other remedies are. State ex rel. Dowe v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356549 - 2021-04-20

[PDF] Milprint, Inc. v. Randy L. Flynn
fees. On remand the trial court shall enter judgment dismissing Milprint’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26545 - 2017-09-21

Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
judgment, and overly aggressive and assaultive behavior by" Christensen. Christensen's off-duty conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and affirmed the judgment. See State v. Segner, No. 1999AP935-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57175 - 2010-12-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887493 - 2024-12-12

CA Blank Order
that the judgments and order are summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117693 - 2014-07-17

Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
findings James disputes. Under these circumstances, we are reluctant to substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31