Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54471 - 54480 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54471 - 54480 of 74898 for public records.
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
of the crime, his lies to the police, his conduct in confronting Garrett with a weapon, and his criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
of the crime, his lies to the police, his conduct in confronting Garrett with a weapon, and his criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie N. Pearson
was not asked any question about these potential witnesses. The record does not support Pearson’s long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
was not asked any question about these potential witnesses. The record does not support Pearson’s long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
Terrance J. Robran v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the record and conferring with the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), LIRC concluded that Robran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14102 - 2005-03-31
the record and conferring with the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), LIRC concluded that Robran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14102 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Martin contends that the State misrepresented facts and referred to evidence not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
argument. Martin contends that the State misrepresented facts and referred to evidence not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
[PDF]
State v. James C. Sarlund
Sarlund's argument that, on this record, no reasonable jury could find or infer guilt. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
Sarlund's argument that, on this record, no reasonable jury could find or infer guilt. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Perry A. Felton
. 1 The injunction is not in the appellate record. It is the responsibility of appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
. 1 The injunction is not in the appellate record. It is the responsibility of appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael Brandt
it. As an addendum to the standard questionnaire, Brandt's attorney penned the elements of the crimes. The record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
it. As an addendum to the standard questionnaire, Brandt's attorney penned the elements of the crimes. The record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
he restricted his evaluation to her records and discussions that he had with the staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
he restricted his evaluation to her records and discussions that he had with the staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
indication of bipolar disorder, but he testified he did not believe Gadzinski’s record was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
indication of bipolar disorder, but he testified he did not believe Gadzinski’s record was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vernon Dansand
application of accepted legal standards to the facts of record. See State v. Wallerman, 203 Wis.2d 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13766 - 2014-09-15
application of accepted legal standards to the facts of record. See State v. Wallerman, 203 Wis.2d 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13766 - 2014-09-15