Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54481 - 54490 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 54481 - 54490 of 61694 for judgment.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
State v. John R. Jagusch
arguments and affirmed the judgment. See State v. Jagusch, No. 96-3457, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
arguments and affirmed the judgment. See State v. Jagusch, No. 96-3457, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
Larson, pro se, appeals a small claims judgment dismissing his breach of contract claims for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79970 - 2012-03-26
Larson, pro se, appeals a small claims judgment dismissing his breach of contract claims for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79970 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics June 2024
in the judgment, in which ZIEGLER, C.J., joined. 06/27/2024 2021AP1589 Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824126 - 2024-09-10
in the judgment, in which ZIEGLER, C.J., joined. 06/27/2024 2021AP1589 Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824126 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. and order (Oct. 4, 2022). We therefore accepted the no-merit report, affirmed the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
. and order (Oct. 4, 2022). We therefore accepted the no-merit report, affirmed the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
Steven A. Runice v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
by the commission, the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the commission as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20726 - 2005-12-21
by the commission, the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the commission as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20726 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
Allen J. Thomas v. Kenneth N. Johnson
of during discovery. This is not a case in which the trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8893 - 2017-09-19
of during discovery. This is not a case in which the trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8893 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeal. We summarily affirmed the judgment in June 1998. The supreme court denied Ellis’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
appeal. We summarily affirmed the judgment in June 1998. The supreme court denied Ellis’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jill Literski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2213 - 2017-09-19
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2213 - 2017-09-19