Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
-in for sentencing purposes, pursuant to a plea agreement. The court followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
-in for sentencing purposes, pursuant to a plea agreement. The court followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380667 - 2021-06-23
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380667 - 2021-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
awarded Kia sole custody and primary placement of their daughter the same month that Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
awarded Kia sole custody and primary placement of their daughter the same month that Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
in his brief-in-chief that the court erred when it granted Kia’s motion for summary judgment because Kia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15
in his brief-in-chief that the court erred when it granted Kia’s motion for summary judgment because Kia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 37
2 the grandparent visitation statute and an order denying her motion for reconsideration.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27940 - 2014-09-15
2 the grandparent visitation statute and an order denying her motion for reconsideration.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27940 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such motion would have been properly denied, and an attorney is not ineffective by failing to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558344 - 2022-08-23
such motion would have been properly denied, and an attorney is not ineffective by failing to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558344 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
WI 48
excise tax on on-reservation sales of cigarettes to non-tribal purchasers. ¶47 In 1982 the Joint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
excise tax on on-reservation sales of cigarettes to non-tribal purchasers. ¶47 In 1982 the Joint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
Washington's excise tax on on-reservation sales of cigarettes to non-tribal purchasers. ¶47 In 1982 the Joint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
Washington's excise tax on on-reservation sales of cigarettes to non-tribal purchasers. ¶47 In 1982 the Joint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
, this court ordered the parties to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
, this court ordered the parties to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April 11, 2002. Other important
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21
to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April 11, 2002. Other important
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21