Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
February 2008 Unpublished Orders
2007AP000045 Nelly De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation 2007AP000048 CR State v. Emmanuel R
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31919 - 2014-09-15
2007AP000045 Nelly De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation 2007AP000048 CR State v. Emmanuel R
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31919 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
September Unpublished Orders
2005AP000604 City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey 2005AP000746 FT State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19722 - 2014-09-15
2005AP000604 City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey 2005AP000746 FT State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
February Unpublished orders
v. Carl P. Heise 04-0810 De Ann Nichols v. Monte Nichols 04-0851 David W. Orr v. Jon
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47 - 2017-09-20
v. Carl P. Heise 04-0810 De Ann Nichols v. Monte Nichols 04-0851 David W. Orr v. Jon
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred from filing a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
is procedurally barred from filing a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
questions of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
questions of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
Vances H. Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
is a question of law which we review de novo. Blackbourne v. School Dist. of Onalaska, 174 Wis.2d 496, 499, 497
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10239 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. Blackbourne v. School Dist. of Onalaska, 174 Wis.2d 496, 499, 497
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ryan Fontecchio
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15658 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15658 - 2017-09-21
State v. William F. Baskin
an investigatory stop was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3992 - 2005-03-31
an investigatory stop was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092485 - 2026-03-18
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092485 - 2026-03-18
State v. Arrmond B.
, 3 (1992). Whether double jeopardy rights were violated presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31
, 3 (1992). Whether double jeopardy rights were violated presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31