Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 68275 for did.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 68275 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did the State offer ‘any’ proof during the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did the State offer ‘any’ proof during the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
Bruce Joseph Croushore v.
that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion by not addressing Mr. Croushore’s request for waiver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17362 - 2005-03-31
that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion by not addressing Mr. Croushore’s request for waiver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71621 - 2014-09-15
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71621 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Arthur G. Ptack
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove the amount of the expansion, but rather simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove the amount of the expansion, but rather simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a marked squad car, followed Konkol but did not activate the car’s emergency lights. Konkol drove to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30099 - 2014-09-15
a marked squad car, followed Konkol but did not activate the car’s emergency lights. Konkol drove to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30099 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), third offense. Wold argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2011-12-18
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), third offense. Wold argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2011-12-18