Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 15430 for probate.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 15430 for probate.
Frontsheet
to the charge. On May 26, 2011, he was convicted and sentenced to a term of three years' probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87477 - 2012-09-24
to the charge. On May 26, 2011, he was convicted and sentenced to a term of three years' probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87477 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
State v. Tyree Goodrich
on eight years’ probation. Consistent with the joint recommendation, the court imposed concurrent three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
on eight years’ probation. Consistent with the joint recommendation, the court imposed concurrent three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
term of consecutive probation on the second count. ¶3 The victims were injured in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
term of consecutive probation on the second count. ¶3 The victims were injured in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a certain intersection; and said that Chris was on probation or parole. All these facts could be generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
a certain intersection; and said that Chris was on probation or parole. All these facts could be generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
stated that it would never grant straight probation to a person convicted of a particular offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65191 - 2011-05-31
stated that it would never grant straight probation to a person convicted of a particular offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65191 - 2011-05-31
CA Blank Order
of his probation in a separate matter. Out of a maximum possible forty-six-year sentence, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145008 - 2015-07-27
of his probation in a separate matter. Out of a maximum possible forty-six-year sentence, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145008 - 2015-07-27
CA Blank Order
sentencing was withheld in favor of probation.[1] Harris’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136994 - 2015-03-10
sentencing was withheld in favor of probation.[1] Harris’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136994 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision, stayed for three years of probation with ninety days’ condition time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06
years’ extended supervision, stayed for three years of probation with ninety days’ condition time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and a probation hold in a 2003 case. Tucker’s probation in the 2003 case was revoked, and Tucker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
and a probation hold in a 2003 case. Tucker’s probation in the 2003 case was revoked, and Tucker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and two years of probation with 90 days of conditional jail time. Knutson’s counsel agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91454 - 2014-09-15
, and two years of probation with 90 days of conditional jail time. Knutson’s counsel agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91454 - 2014-09-15