Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 72753 for we.
Search results 5451 - 5460 of 72753 for we.
[PDF]
State v. Jason J.C.
no authority under § 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
no authority under § 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark Koshney
.[3] We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2701 - 2005-03-31
.[3] We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L.
of restitution violated the statutory mandates. We disagree; instead, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31
of restitution violated the statutory mandates. We disagree; instead, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek L. Naff
We conclude that: (1) there was probable cause to arrest even absent the PBT; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
We conclude that: (1) there was probable cause to arrest even absent the PBT; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anou Lo
improperly admitted certain No. 97-0023-CR 2 evidence. Because we find that defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11915 - 2017-09-21
improperly admitted certain No. 97-0023-CR 2 evidence. Because we find that defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11915 - 2017-09-21
Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
crew’s actions were ministerial, thus exposing the County to liability. We determine that the crew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2005-03-31
crew’s actions were ministerial, thus exposing the County to liability. We determine that the crew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Spencer
to arrest him. We disagree and conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Spencer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19
to arrest him. We disagree and conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Spencer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19
State v. Linda L. Middaugh
on appeal, all of which we reject. We affirm the judgment. Background ¶2 On January 24, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7428 - 2005-03-31
on appeal, all of which we reject. We affirm the judgment. Background ¶2 On January 24, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7428 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Green from a judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We reverse the dismissal as to two claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36194 - 2009-04-15
Green from a judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We reverse the dismissal as to two claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36194 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Harry Montey
claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Montey’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 Montey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Montey’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 Montey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15