Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54521 - 54530 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54521 - 54530 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
WI App 68
.” 1 We note that the caption, complaint, motion to dismiss, briefs of the parties, and other record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
.” 1 We note that the caption, complaint, motion to dismiss, briefs of the parties, and other record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
record. His attorney spoke for him at sentencing and made the following representations about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
record. His attorney spoke for him at sentencing and made the following representations about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly denied his motion for plea withdrawal because the record as a whole, including the limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
properly denied his motion for plea withdrawal because the record as a whole, including the limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 38
was in evidence. There is no record of what action the judge took in response, though the judge stated later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28118 - 2007-03-27
was in evidence. There is no record of what action the judge took in response, though the judge stated later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28118 - 2007-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Speers
enforcement drug interdiction effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17730 - 2017-09-21
enforcement drug interdiction effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17730 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. This argument fails for two reasons. First, Griswold does not point to record evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-20
judgment. This argument fails for two reasons. First, Griswold does not point to record evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea hearing record.’” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶40 (quoted source omitted). ¶11 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
the plea hearing record.’” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶40 (quoted source omitted). ¶11 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 61
to a bench trial, where the sole evidence admitted was a 300-plus page collection of bank records from five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217694 - 2018-10-11
to a bench trial, where the sole evidence admitted was a 300-plus page collection of bank records from five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217694 - 2018-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609270 - 2023-01-10
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609270 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to find that the record contains strong evidence of actual guilt as required under” Alford. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240190 - 2019-05-02
to find that the record contains strong evidence of actual guilt as required under” Alford. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240190 - 2019-05-02