Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54551 - 54560 of 83218 for simple case search.
Search results 54551 - 54560 of 83218 for simple case search.
State v. Milton H. Smith
that the provisions of § 343.305(4), Stats., squarely govern this case. This statutory section dictates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
that the provisions of § 343.305(4), Stats., squarely govern this case. This statutory section dictates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
This case was decided on several motions for summary judgment. The facts included here are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49635 - 2010-05-03
This case was decided on several motions for summary judgment. The facts included here are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49635 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and read-in; another criminal case was dismissed; and the State agreed to recommend eligibility
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312467 - 2020-12-10
and read-in; another criminal case was dismissed; and the State agreed to recommend eligibility
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312467 - 2020-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
enforcement about criminal cases unrelated to his own. At sentencing, Massey and the State jointly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2014-07-22
enforcement about criminal cases unrelated to his own. At sentencing, Massey and the State jointly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
that the circumstances of the case will not change. See id. at 351, 485 N.W.2d at 836. A defendant who, of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
that the circumstances of the case will not change. See id. at 351, 485 N.W.2d at 836. A defendant who, of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made the recommendation to the primary prosecutor on the case, but she declined to reduce the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
made the recommendation to the primary prosecutor on the case, but she declined to reduce the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
State v. Pamela P.
the termination-of-parental-rights case against her.[1] Her only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2014-06-10
the termination-of-parental-rights case against her.[1] Her only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2014-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
party’s submissions to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
party’s submissions to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
on a case cited in the jury instruction comment that held: “The general rule is that if a person performs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
on a case cited in the jury instruction comment that held: “The general rule is that if a person performs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with me on the case, that there was more than one person on the case being charged with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15
with me on the case, that there was more than one person on the case being charged with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15