Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 69368 for as he.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 69368 for as he.
State v. Susan J. Dreyfus
and no one responded. While waiting at the front door, Camacho approached from outside and indicated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12943 - 2005-03-31
and no one responded. While waiting at the front door, Camacho approached from outside and indicated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12943 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and told Simonsen not to serve him any more shots. However, Novak explained he “talked [Simonsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92780 - 2013-02-11
and told Simonsen not to serve him any more shots. However, Novak explained he “talked [Simonsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92780 - 2013-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
of the officer who had conducted the searches. He testified that in April 1999, he went to Jansen’s home to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2923 - 2005-03-31
of the officer who had conducted the searches. He testified that in April 1999, he went to Jansen’s home to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2923 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
of the officer who had conducted the searches. He testified that in April 1999, he went to Jansen’s home to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
of the officer who had conducted the searches. He testified that in April 1999, he went to Jansen’s home to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59509 - 2014-09-15
. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59509 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. She testified that when she approached the front desk to assist Martin, “he asked [her] where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
. She testified that when she approached the front desk to assist Martin, “he asked [her] where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of first-degree reckless homicide. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26889 - 2014-09-15
of first-degree reckless homicide. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. In 2009, Lewis pled guilty to an amended charge of first-degree reckless homicide. He was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
. In 2009, Lewis pled guilty to an amended charge of first-degree reckless homicide. He was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
State v. David L. Fries
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11602 - 2017-09-19
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11602 - 2017-09-19