Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant at his home. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant at his home. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking sentence modification.[2] On appeal, DeNormandie argues that the search warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
seeking sentence modification.[2] On appeal, DeNormandie argues that the search warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
State v. David W. Janke
and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds of misrepresentation or omission of a material fact. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds of misrepresentation or omission of a material fact. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Janke
a reasonable suspicion to seize the package and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19
a reasonable suspicion to seize the package and that the search warrant was invalid on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph P. DeFilippo
of a warrant application. A detective from the Washington County Sheriff’s Department and the assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19197 - 2005-09-19
of a warrant application. A detective from the Washington County Sheriff’s Department and the assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19197 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. DeFilippo
of a warrant application. A detective from the Washington County Sheriff’s Department and the assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19197 - 2017-09-21
of a warrant application. A detective from the Washington County Sheriff’s Department and the assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19197 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 59
. (GP&L), which was a search that allegedly exceeded the scope of the search warrant. The fourth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
. (GP&L), which was a search that allegedly exceeded the scope of the search warrant. The fourth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, L.L.C. (GP&L), which was a search that allegedly exceeded the scope of the search warrant. The fourth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
, L.L.C. (GP&L), which was a search that allegedly exceeded the scope of the search warrant. The fourth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Krenzke testified that the police then got a search warrant and searched Groenke’s house: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15
. Krenzke testified that the police then got a search warrant and searched Groenke’s house: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15