Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
Whether a statute is constitutional present a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pittman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5059 - 2005-03-31
Whether a statute is constitutional present a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pittman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
responsibility.” Id., ¶36. “The initial decision on joinder is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
responsibility.” Id., ¶36. “The initial decision on joinder is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
of a statute is a legal question, subject to de novo review. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16279 - 2017-09-21
of a statute is a legal question, subject to de novo review. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Dane County v. C.M.B., 165 Wis. 2d 703, 707, 478 N.W.2d 385 (1992). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817887 - 2024-06-25
de novo. See Dane County v. C.M.B., 165 Wis. 2d 703, 707, 478 N.W.2d 385 (1992). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817887 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
to de novo review." State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13234 - 2017-09-21
to de novo review." State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Jennifer is free to file a new motion. We will not, however, consider Jennifer’s motion de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
that Jennifer is free to file a new motion. We will not, however, consider Jennifer’s motion de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional standards, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149432 - 2017-09-21
to constitutional standards, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Curtis Dortch
the record de novo to determine whether the procedure used by the trial court in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10641 - 2017-09-20
the record de novo to determine whether the procedure used by the trial court in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10641 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Peter Bekersky
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kristi M. Hogan
facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State ex rel. Stedman v. Rohner, 149 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10877 - 2005-03-31
facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State ex rel. Stedman v. Rohner, 149 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10877 - 2005-03-31