Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 68499 for did.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Waylon R. Zrinsky
. Zrinsky contends that the PBT results should have been suppressed because the officer did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21270 - 2017-09-21
. Zrinsky contends that the PBT results should have been suppressed because the officer did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Adam V. Tovsen
to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7077 - 2017-09-20
to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7077 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Hicks
seventy-two hours of the disorderly conduct incident. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18372 - 2017-09-21
seventy-two hours of the disorderly conduct incident. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18372 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it had it issued a new injunction with the same terms as the previous one, and that it did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15
that it had it issued a new injunction with the same terms as the previous one, and that it did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
performance was deficient because counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
performance was deficient because counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Wizner
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sherard D. Jenkins
program. Based on that, Jenkins seeks resentencing. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25294 - 2017-09-21
program. Based on that, Jenkins seeks resentencing. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
suppression motion.1 Because the police officer’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion.1 Because the police officer’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15