Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 77716 for restraining orders.

State v. David Beck
in restraints does not require declaration of a mistrial. [A] juror’s observation of a restrained defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5710 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
frisk was performed; (4) the manner in which the defendant was restrained; (5) whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35454 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Edward W. Ruzga
by means of physical force or show of authority has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26514 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David Beck
in restraints does not require declaration of a mistrial. [A] juror’s observation of a restrained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
bloodshot, and he detected an order of intoxicants on Teniente’s breath. Roloff also observed a bottle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107419 - 2017-09-21

Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
the wheel meant that she was restraining the vehicle which, the Village contends, falls within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13

COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances inquiry). The police did not threaten, handcuff, restrain, or point their weapons at Markov
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103323 - 2013-10-29

[PDF] Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
in the driver's seat behind the wheel meant that she was restraining the vehicle which, the Village contends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21382 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
] words were slurred.” Roloff observed that Teniente’s eyes were bloodshot, and he detected an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29

[PDF] Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
oath of secrecy when the John Doe proceedings were already subject to a secrecy order, and whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18502 - 2017-09-21